Publication
La Cour suprême du Canada tranche : les cadres ne pourront se syndiquer au Québec
Le 19 avril dernier, la Cour suprême du Canada a rendu une décision fort attendue en matière de syndicalisation des cadres.
Hong Kong ZAS | Publication | juin 2022
The legal maxim “justice delayed is justice denied” is well known. Historically, parties in legal proceedings in Hong Kong have had very little guidance on the time it takes for Hong Kong Courts to hand down judgments after substantive hearings and trials. Following the recent introduction of Practice Direction 36 (effective from 6 June 2022), practitioners now have better clarity on when judgments would be handed down.
The new Practice Direction 36 (the “New PD”) sheds light on the estimated timeframe for the High Court of Hong Kong to hand down reserved judgments. In summary, the time to be taken by the courts depends on the following factors:
The New PD applies to all cases before the Court of First Instance, the Court of Appeal and the Masters, except for non-refoulement claims and related matters. Here is a snapshot of the respective timeframe for the different types of cases:
Civil cases |
|
---|---|
Nature of application |
Estimated Timeframe for Handing Down Judgments |
Paper applications (paragraph 14) |
Within 3 months after close of parties’ submissions |
Interlocutory applications (paragraph 13) |
Within 3 months after conclusion of hearing |
Trials and substantive applications, such as the substantive hearing of an originating summons, judicial reviews and tribunal appeals, which last for less than 15 days (paragraph 11) |
Within 6 months after conclusion of hearing |
Trials and substantive applications which last for 15 days or more (paragraph 12) |
Within 9 months after conclusion of hearing |
Criminal cases |
|
Nature of application |
Estimated Timeframe for Handing Down Judgments |
Bail Applications (paragraph 16) |
Ordinarily be delivered at the conclusion of the hearing Within 14 days after conclusion of the hearing if judgment is reserved or reasons for judgment is to be handed down |
Magistracy Appeals and other applications (excluding bail) (paragraph 15) |
Within 3 months after close of parties’ submissions/ conclusion of oral hearing (where there is one) |
Civil cases |
|
---|---|
Nature of application |
Estimated Timeframe for Handing Down Judgments |
Applications for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal (paragraph 6) |
Within 3 months after close of parties’ submissions/ conclusion of the oral hearing (where there is one) |
Paper applications (paragraph 5) |
Within 6 months from the date a judge is assigned to the case |
Oral hearings (paragraph 4) |
Within 6 months after conclusion of hearing |
Criminal cases |
|
Nature of application |
Estimated Timeframe for Handing Down Judgments |
Bail Applications (paragraph 9) |
Ordinarily be delivered at the conclusion of the hearing Within 14 days after conclusion of hearing if judgment is reserved or reasons for judgment is to be handed down |
Oral hearings (paragraphs 7 – 8) |
Within 3 months (for hearings before a single judge) or 6 months (for hearings before the full bench, including a two-menber court) after the conclusion of the hearing |
Applications for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal (paragraph 10) |
Within 3 months after close of parties’ submissions/ conclusion of oral hearing (where there is one) |
Other miscellaneous applications (paragraph 10) |
Within 3 months after close of parties’ submissions/ conclusion of oral hearing (where there is one) |
Nature of application |
Estimated Timeframe for Handing Down Judgments |
All contested matters (paragraph 17) |
Expected to be delivered at the conclusion of the hearing Within 3 months after conclusion of hearing if judgment is reserved |
Assessment of damages (paragraph 18) |
Within 6 months after conclusion of hearing |
Notably, the New PD also requires the court to inform parties of the actual handing down date. When reserving judgment after an oral hearing, the court must at the same time fix the actual handing down date of the judgment in accordance with the timeframes set out above (paragraph 19). For paper applications or disposals, parties will be informed of the date in writing once a judge has been assigned or immediately after the close of the parties’ submissions (paragraph 20).
With the New PD in place, parties will have better clarity and expectations as to when judgments will be delivered. Practitioners are also now better placed to advise clients more effectively and adjust their case strategies accordingly in line with the timelines set. That said, it remains uncertain as to whether judicial efficiency will in fact be enhanced, as judgments will be considered to be delivered “on time” so long as the time taken is within the timeframe stipulated under the New PD, which may not be necessarily shortened when compared to past practice.
Publication
Le 19 avril dernier, la Cour suprême du Canada a rendu une décision fort attendue en matière de syndicalisation des cadres.
Publication
Le budget 2024 propose d’élargir la portée de certains pouvoirs permettant à l’ARC de demander des renseignements aux contribuables tout en prévoyant de nouvelles conséquences pour les contribuables contrevenants.
Publication
L'impôt minimum de remplacement (IMR) est un impôt sur le revenu additionnel prévu dans la Loi de l’impôt sur le revenu (Canada) (la « Loi ») auquel sont assujettis les particuliers et certaines fiducies qui pourraient autrement avoir recours à certaines déductions et exemptions et à certains crédits pour réduire leur impôt sur le revenu fédéral canadien régulier.
Abonnez-vous et restez à l’affût des nouvelles juridiques, informations et événements les plus récents...
© Norton Rose Fulbright LLP 2023